A new approach to expedited arbitration

A faster path to resolution — built around dialogue

Workshop Arbitration is an alternative to traditional expedited proceedings. By centering the process on a structured verbal workshop rather than written pleadings alone, it accelerates understanding, raises settlement chances, and delivers a binding award on a tight timeline.

The Concept

The workshop as the core of the process

Workshop Arbitration is designed as an alternative to traditional expedited proceedings. It is comparably quick but places emphasis on direct verbal exchange rather than written debate alone.

The workshop-session is the core element. The verbal debate allows getting to the core of the dispute quickly and opens the opportunity for a settlement when the solution becomes evident in the presence of all participants to the proceedings.

Conventional model
Traditional expedited
  • Debate conducted primarily in writing
  • Limited direct dialogue between parties and arbitrator
  • Settlement hard to facilitate
  • Arbitrator interprets the case with limited direct interaction
The alternative
Workshop Arbitration
  • Structured verbal workshop at the centre of the process
  • Direct Q&A between arbitrator, parties and witnesses
  • Active, incentivised settlement opportunity
  • Arbitrator builds understanding through live discussion
Outcome 1
Settlement
Both parties may reach a point in the discussion where the likely result becomes clear and a settlement is found. Alternative solutions may also emerge. The arbitrator may introduce settlement slots if both parties expressly wish so. A settlement may be recorded as a consent award upon request of the parties.
Outcome 2
Summary award
If no settlement is reached, each party makes a brief oral closing statement at the conclusion of the workshop. The arbitrator then renders a concise, final and binding summary award of no more than 20 pages within 3 weeks of the close of the workshop.
How it works

From notice to award, step by step

i–iii
Initiation & scheduling
Standard initiation up to file transmission; an experienced sole arbitrator is appointed; workshop and CMC dates are blocked early and held firm, followed by a procedural timetable.
iv
Summary statements
Each party submits a summary statement of no more than 20 pages within 3 weeks, with documentary evidence and short witness statements.
v–vi
Pre-workshop CMC
Parties and arbitrator align on the workshop format, agenda and attendees; skeleton arguments or additional evidence are ordered only if strictly necessary.
vii
Workshop (up to 5 days)
The arbitrator leads a structured, in-person discussion in three phases — clarification of the issues resulting in a roadmap, hearing of witnesses and counsel, and a settlement opportunity or short closing statements.
viii
Summary award
A concise, binding award of no more than 20 pages is issued within 3 weeks of the close of the workshop.
Timetable

An example timetable

A realistic illustration of the pace of Workshop Arbitration, from the transmission of the file to the arbitrator to the issued award.

Roughly 4 months from file transmission to summary award is feasible
DateWhoProcedural step
1 JanuaryArbitratorTransmission of the file to the arbitrator
11 JanuaryAllCMC and workshop dates blocked; procedural timetable issued
22 JanuaryClaimantSummary statement of claim with evidence
12 FebruaryRespondentSummary statement of defence with evidence
22 FebruaryAllPre-workshop CMC
5 MarchPartiesSkeleton arguments and additional evidence (if ordered)
18–21 MarchAllWorkshop — including verbal opening and closing statements
12 AprilArbitratorSummary award or consent award

Illustrative example only. Actual dates depend on the availability of the participants and the procedural timetable issued by the arbitrator.

Advantages & Risks

An honest assessment

Workshop Arbitration offers significant advantages over traditional expedited proceedings, alongside challenges that require careful management.

Speed
As fast as or faster than conventional expedited proceedings
Understanding
Direct dialogue gives the arbitrator a deeper and quicker grasp of the case
Settlement
Considerably higher settlement likelihood as the solution will become evident during the workshop discussion
Finality
A concise, binding award delivered within weeks of the workshop if no settlement is found
Advantages
  • +It is as quick — if not quicker — than expedited proceedings.
  • +The emphasis on personal discussion facilitates a better understanding of the case by the arbitrator.
  • +The parties have more influence on the proper understanding of the case, as they can see from the questions whether the case is well understood.
  • +The settlement chance is considerably higher than in proceedings that merely focus on written debate, and is incentivised for counsel and the arbitrator: the arbitrator's fee is not reduced, and counsel do not lose fees as there is no post-workshop stage.
  • +There is a chance to find alternative solutions during the workshop discussions.
Risks & Challenges
  • Bad-faith parties may find ways to complicate a fruitful discussion during the workshop.
  • Taking of evidence and legal discussions must be distinguished and well managed during the workshop.
  • The questions-led discussion requires experienced arbitrators.
"The advantages are sufficiently strong to offer Workshop Arbitration as an additional option to parties in dispute."
The Rules

Workshop Arbitration Rules

These Rules govern ad hoc-arbitration proceedings conducted as Workshop Arbitration. They are proposed for disputes between sophisticated Parties, of limited factual complexity, and in which the relationship between the Parties is a considerable factor.

Version 1.0 · Proposed by Dr. Simon Gabriel LL.M., Gabriel Arbitration AG, Zurich
Article 1Scope and Opt-In
1.1
These Rules apply where the parties have agreed in writing or text form to resolve their dispute by Workshop Arbitration, or where the parties and the arbitrator agree to adopt these Rules after the commencement of proceedings.
1.2
Where these Rules are silent, the parties and the arbitrator shall proceed in a manner consistent with the general principle of efficiency within the limits of due process at the seat of the arbitration.
Article 2Commencement
2.1
Proceedings commence upon receipt by the respondent of a written notice of arbitration identifying the parties, the dispute, and the relief sought.
2.2
Within 10 days of commencement, the parties shall jointly nominate a sole arbitrator. Failing agreement, the arbitrator shall be appointed by a mutually agreed appointing authority.
2.3
The arbitrator should have considerable experience as a sole arbitrator and/or presiding arbitrator. Experience in mediation can be helpful.
Article 3Seat, Language, and Applicable Law
3.1
The parties shall agree on the seat of arbitration, the language of the proceedings, and the substantive law applicable to the dispute. Failing agreement, the arbitrator shall determine these matters.
Article 4Early Scheduling
4.1
Within 10 days of the transmission of the file to the arbitrator, the arbitrator shall, in consultation with the parties, block dates for:
  • (a)the pre-workshop case management conference (CMC) pursuant to Article 6; and
  • (b)the workshop pursuant to Article 7.
4.2
The arbitrator and the parties shall treat the scheduling of these dates as a priority and shall hold them firm absent exceptional circumstances.
4.3
The arbitrator shall promptly issue a procedural timetable setting out the key dates following confirmation of the scheduled dates.
Article 5Written Submissions
5.1
Within 3 weeks of the transmission of the file to the arbitrator, the claimant shall submit a summary statement of claim, not exceeding 20 pages, together with all documentary evidence relied upon and short witness statements from persons who will attend the workshop.
5.2
Within 3 weeks of receipt of the claimant's submission, the respondent shall submit a summary statement of defense on the same terms.
5.3
The submissions shall be concise and focused. Voluminous exhibits should be avoided unless strictly necessary.
5.4
There shall be no further written submissions unless the arbitrator so orders following the pre-workshop CMC (Article 6).
Article 6Pre-Workshop Case Management Conference
6.1
Following receipt of both summary statements, the arbitrator shall convene the pre-workshop case management conference (CMC) with the parties at the date blocked pursuant to Article 4.
6.2
At the CMC, the arbitrator and the parties shall discuss:
  • (a)the format, agenda, and duration of the workshop;
  • (b)whether skeleton arguments or additional evidence are required before the workshop (Article 6.3);
  • (c)the persons who will attend the workshop, including potential witnesses; and
  • (d)any other procedural matters.
6.3
If the arbitrator determines that skeleton arguments or additional evidence are necessary, the arbitrator shall so order shortly after the CMC, specifying the scope and the deadline for submission. Such additional submissions shall be limited to what is strictly necessary and shall not duplicate the summary statements already filed.
6.4
The arbitrator shall issue a brief procedural order following the CMC confirming the workshop format and any orders made under Article 6.3.
Article 7The Workshop
7.1
The workshop shall take place in person at the date blocked pursuant to Article 4. It shall last no longer than 5 days.
7.2
The workshop shall be structured as discussed during the CMC. The following three phases are recommended (but not binding, if the arbitrator considers a different structure as more suitable):
  • (a)Phase 1: Free verbal consideration and clarification of the issues in dispute which results in a roadmap setting out which factual and legal questions must be answered in order to decide the dispute.
  • (b)Phase 2: Hearing of witnesses on factual issues and legal counsel on legal issues set out in the roadmap.
  • (c)Phase 3: Facilitation of settlement discussions (with or without assistance by the arbitrator in line with Article 8.1 below) and short oral closing statements on all issues (in line with Article 9.1 below), if no settlement is reached.
7.3
The arbitrator shall manage the workshop actively to ensure efficient use of time and equal treatment of the parties.
7.4
The workshop may be adjourned and resumed within the agreed dates at the arbitrator's discretion.
Article 8Settlement Facilitation
8.1
During the workshop, the arbitrator may, with the express prior agreement of all parties, introduce settlement discussions or a dedicated settlement slot, with or without the arbitrator's assistance. If the parties agree that the arbitrator assists in settlement discussions, they shall confirm in advance and in writing that any statements by the arbitrator during settlement discussions shall not disqualify the arbitrator with a view to impartiality and/or independence.
8.2
If a settlement is reached, it may be recorded as a consent award upon request of the parties.
8.3
The arbitrator's fee shall not be reduced in the event of a settlement.
Article 9Closing and Costs
9.1
If no settlement is reached, each party shall be invited to make a brief oral closing statement at the conclusion of the workshop.
9.2
Each party shall submit a statement of costs within 5 days of the close of the workshop.
Article 10The Award
10.1
The arbitrator shall render a summary award within 3 weeks of the close of the workshop.
10.2
The award shall not exceed 20 pages and shall set out the arbitrator's decision and the essential reasons in a concise manner.
10.3
The award shall be final and binding on the parties.
Article 11Confidentiality
11.1
The arbitration, all submissions, evidence, and the award shall be confidential. The parties and the arbitrator shall not disclose any information relating to the proceedings to third parties without the prior written consent of all parties, except as required by law.
Article 12Fees and Costs
12.1
The arbitrator's fees shall be agreed between the parties and the arbitrator prior to the commencement of proceedings, or determined by reference to any applicable institutional fee schedule.
12.2
In absence of an agreement, the fee of the arbitrator shall be USD 80'000 plus reasonable expenses. If the amount in dispute is above USD 10 million, the fee of the arbitrator shall be USD 130'000 plus reasonable expenses.
12.3
The arbitrator shall have the power to allocate the costs of the arbitration between the parties in the award, taking into account all relevant circumstances.
Article 13General
13.1
These Rules may be adopted with or without modification by agreement of the parties regarding time limits and costs. If the Parties otherwise modify these Rules, they must not use the term "Workshop Arbitration" for their proceedings.
13.2
The arbitrator shall have the power to decide any procedural questions not covered by these Rules.
13.3
These Rules shall be interpreted in a manner consistent with the objective of resolving disputes efficiently, fairly, and with a genuine opportunity for settlement.
13.4
The arbitrator shall not be liable vis-à-vis the Parties except for gross negligence and/or intentional misconduct.
About

The author

Dr. Simon Gabriel
Dr. Simon Gabriel, LL.M.
Gabriel Arbitration AG · Zurich, Switzerland

Dr. Simon Gabriel is the founder of Gabriel Arbitration AG, a Zurich-based boutique dedicated exclusively to international arbitration. He acts as arbitrator and counsel in international commercial disputes. Workshop Arbitration reflects his conviction that many disputes are resolved faster — and better — when the process is built around structured dialogue rather than written debate alone.

Rämistrasse 6, 8001 Zurich, Switzerland · s.gabriel@gabriel-arbitration.ch